Rendition
When Egyptian-born terrorist suspect Anwar El-Ibrahimi (Omar Metwally) disappears on a flight from South Africa to Washington, D.C., his American wife, Isabella (Reese Witherspoon), travels to Washington to try and learn the reason for his disappearance. Meanwhile, at a secret detention facility somewhere outside the United States, CIA analyst Douglas Freeman (Jake Gyllenhaal) is forced to question his assignment in an attempt to save thousands as he becomes a party to the torture of El-Ibrahimi.
The film’s theme reminds me of "Babel" and two upcoming movies with the same theme "A Mighty Heart "(Angelina Jolie) and "The Kingdom" all of which speak about terrorism in different forms and tackle it in different perspectives. This led me to think if the need for public awareness about world terrorism is essential. Which further led me to think about the ways how popular culture work. At the top, producers generate "ideas" which they believe will be of public interest which, if reception is great, would mean money.
However, the number of moviegoers inside the theater I went to proved the film’s not a runaway hit. Well, this is quite understandable since Filipinos are not really interested in drama especially if it’s Hollywood.
Roger Ebert, a notable film critic, gave the film four stars out of four, saying that, "Rendition is valuable and rare. It is a movie about the theory and practice of two things: torture and personal responsibility. And it is wise about what is right, and what is wrong."
It’s valuable, but it’s not really rare. The film’s strongest point is it’s subject: rendition. Next would be how the complications (characters’ dilemma) build up. They swirl upward until they reach the boiling point. The characters face the hardest decision, and you as a viewer struggle in your seat too if what they’ve done is right or wrong. You’d say "Oh, please don’t do that." "Idiot, why did you do that?"
The torture scenes lack terrifying elements. You can hardly feel the victim’s pain. You wouldn’t care too if he’s telling the truth.
Gyllenhaal plays a heroic character - his is the most admirable. He does what he thinks is right. One scene I liked the most is the one which Gyllenhaal hangs up when his supervisor (he works for the CIA) asks him where the suspect is - at that point, embarking on a trip back to the US - whom he has just saved. Grave consequences await, but he’s determined to save the one whom they accuse.
I almost shed a tear when Anwar El-Ibrahimi arrives at their home, his son recognizes him. It must be hard to live life again after the terror he’s gone into.
A friend of mine thinks Witherspoon and Meryll Streep’s presence are not essential in the movie. He pointed out it’s because they’re shadowed by the main protoganist who is played by a not-so-popular actor. I argued by telling him, that why I liked it more. Popular stars on the side of the circle!
There are still a lot of things I want to discuss in this movie but I’m afraid this review’s getting longer. And there are things that are better left unsaid.






